Junk Science Front and Center in Recent Judicial Hellholes Verdicts
The changes to Federal Rule of Evidence 702 last year were supposed to be a watershed moment for expert testimony
Judicial HellholesThe changes to Federal Rule of Evidence 702 last year were supposed to be a watershed moment for expert testimony
Judicial HellholesFollowing the implementation of the newly amended Rule 702, ATRF has applauded judges across the country for stepping up to
Judicial HellholesATRF is a staunch proponent of applying rigorous scientific standards for evidence to be introduced in court and long has
Points of LightOn Wednesday, April 10th, a hearing on a motion to disqualify a prominent plaintiffs’ firm and a lead attorney from
Judicial HellholesToday, April 5, 2021, ATRA joined an amicus brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to grant a petition for certiorari in a talcum powder case that initially resulted in an
Judicial HellholesThis week, Johnson & Johnson requested the U.S. Supreme Court review a landmark talcum powder case which resulted in the
Judicial Hellholes