California Ranks #1 in 2013/2014 ‘Judicial Hellholes’ Report
Civil Courts in Louisiana, New York City, West Virginia, Illinois and Florida Also Spotlighted
Important ‘Special Feature’ Looks at Trial Lawyers’ Attempts to ‘Circumvent’ Federal Law Governing Adjudication of Class Actions
WASHINGTON, D.C., December 17, 2013 – The American Tort Reform Foundation issued its annual Judicial Hellholes® report today, naming civil courts in California, Louisiana, New York City, West Virginia, Southwestern Illinois’ Madison and St. Clair counties, and South Florida among the nation’s “most unfair.”
“With both this annual report and a year-round website, our Judicial Hellholes program since 2002 has been documenting developments in jurisdictions where civil court judges systematically apply laws and court procedures in an unfair and unbalanced manner, generally to the disadvantage of defendants,” began American Tort Reform Association president Tiger Joyce.
“By spotlighting injustices, we have worked to educate the media, public and policymakers about problems and ways to improve the civil justice system,” he continued. “Though it can be tough to make progress in certain states where legislatures are effectively controlled by the plaintiffs’ bar, our Judicial Hellholes program has been credited by judges, lawmakers and business leaders in a number of jurisdictions for sparking debates that led to reforms and better balanced civil courts, which in turn have helped promote economic growth and job creation.
“In addition to ranking and analyzing six ‘Judicial Hellholes,’ the places we consider the worst in which to face a lawsuit,” explained Joyce, “this year’s report also identifies 10 marginally less problematic jurisdictions on the ‘Watch List,’ along with some particularly bad court decisions we call ‘Dishonorable Mentions. ’
“But the Judicial Hellholes report always reports good news, too, and our ‘Points of Light’ section features several laudable court decisions and positive legislative reforms undertaken in 14 tort reform-minded states in 2013. This year’s Points of Light also include important actions taken by state attorneys general.
“Finally, our latest report offers a Special Feature about some troubling attempts by plaintiffs’ lawyers to circumvent the federal Class Action Fairness Act, by keeping massive, multi-state lawsuits in biased state courts, rather than having them heard in neutral federal courts,” Joyce concluded.